How HR5034 Affects Me

April 21st, 2010

If you’re part of the wine community, it’s likely that you’ve heard about the HR5034 bill that’s being considered. I’m not going to go into detail about the legal ramifications, the bill itself, or how the overall community is reacting to the bill (see also, here, here, and here). What I want to tell you about is my personal reaction and how this would affect me.

I live in Massachusetts. As a resident, I have only once or twice had wine shipped to me. At least one of those times, I was forced to ship the wine to a friend’s residence in Rhode Island because it’s considered illegal to ship any booze into the state. Because of that, I end up not ordering from shops within the state because the shipping often costs more than the gas it would take to get to the store and pick up the product.

I’m used to not getting what I want in this matter. I hate it, but I’m used to it. Recently, there were positive changes in the state and I was offered some hope that one day I’ll be able to order the wine I want from any online source and have it shipped to me in a nice, little package. The introduction of HR5034 has pretty much shattered those hopes. If it passes, I’m positive that Massachusetts will quickly move to close doors entirely so that the wholesalers can stuff their pockets with cash while the consumers and small wineries suffer.

The passage of the bill would remove all hope and the kicker is that one of the dudes behind the bill is from Massachussetts. Mr. Delahunt, I don’t think you’re doing right by working on and supporting this bill. I also don’t think it’s right to pepper in buzz words like underage drinking and alcoholism as reasons for the bill’s importance. That is not what this is about. This is about the wholesalers getting nervous and striking back.

I’m disappointed about this and hope it dies a quick death before people give it too much consideration. I would love to wipe the slate clean from this blemish. However, the big shots behind the bill have loads of cash to support this and that’s likely to push it further than I would like.

Again, I’m accustomed to these limitations, but I don’t want to be. We had the ball rolling in the right direction and I’d like it to keep in going. Now, here’s where you come in. If you think this bill sucks, contact your representative. You can find out who that is here and then either get their phone number or send them an email. I suggest both. You can also show your support by joining the fight over on Facebook but obviously, getting in touch with your representative is more important.

  • http://www.drinknectar.com @nectarwine

    Nicely done! I love the personal touch. Thanks for helping support the cause. I, too, hope it dies a quick death

    Josh

    • http://www.thewineingwoman.com/ Amanda Maynard

      Thanks a lot, Josh! This is super important and I hope everyone speaks up about it.

  • toddwernstrom

    Insane. All of it. This bill, like all the others before, is just an example of the way government works: If you can afford to pay lobbyists and make campaign contributions, you get more than heard. You get what you want. Big distributors simply don't want the “competition” from direct shipping. Which is, of course, silly because the vast majority of the shippers are little producers that can't get the Southerns of the world to carry them. So hypocritical wrapping bill language up in platitudes about “temperance” and tax collection. Who's kidding whom? The language in this bill makes it a virtual certainty if passed as is (which, of course, isn't certain at all) that just about any state prohibition would be upheld in court. No one will be able to show by “clear and convincing” evidence (the evidentiary burden in the bill) that the contested state prohibition in no way promotes temperance or efficient tax collection. I think I'd be OK with it if the sponsors just came out and honestly said that they were doing it at the behest of the distribution lobby. (By way of disclosure, I'm a distributor and importer in NYC, and represent precisely the kind of tiny producers who get passed over. And I have no problem with the wine clubs of my producers. I see them as complementary to our relationship, not counterproductive.)

    • http://www.thewineingwoman.com/ Amanda Maynard

      Thanks for chiming in, Todd. I'm so glad that there are so many people out there that want this to go away as quickly as possible. It's especially important that importers/wholesalers like yourself are against this. I've contacted my state reps and am doing all that I can in order to really speak out, but it takes a lot of voices. The more the merrier, I say.

      Cheers!


Copyright © The Wineing Woman. All rights reserved.